|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Thursday, 01 December 2011 13:53 |
|
"RICS is extremely concerned about the practice of speculative claim letters being sent to property valuers on behalf of banks. For this reason, a working group has been established to assess the problem and create a set of recommendations for our members and the wider public, aimed at tackling the issue.
The proposals have now been drafted and we are interested in hearing from RICS members, or those who have experience and understanding of the issue, in relation to the recommendations. We will be publishing the final report early next year with a view to tackling this problem, which is putting the valuation profession and public protection at serious risk."
Quote Robert Peto, RICS Spokesperson
RICS has today launched a consultation to tackle problems about current risk and pricing in professional indemnity insurance (PII) in the UK valuation sector that are creating market dysfunction.
Read full article
RICS Website
1 December 2011
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Friday, 01 July 2011 11:19 |
|
Those without Director and Officers Insurance and those whose policies don't provide cover for Corporate Manslaughter should take note of the resent comments from the Lord Chief Justice following the Court of Appeal has refused leave for Cotswold Geotechnical to appeal against their conviction and sentence for Corporate Manslaughter. Cotswold became the first company to be convicted of Corporate Manslaughter in February 2011 and were fined £385,000. They sought leave to appeal on the basis that a fine of more than their annual turnover was excessive and that their Managing Director’s unavailability due to illness had prevented a fair trial.
The Lord Chief Justice found no grounds for criticising either the way in which the trial had been conducted or the level of the fine imposed. The sentencing guidelines recognised that sometimes the appropriate level of fine might force a company into bankruptcy. To impose a fine of less than the annual turnover would have resulted in a ludicrously small fine for such a serious offence.
David Hedgecock
01 July 2011
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Friday, 25 March 2011 10:16 |
|
When clients select a professional team or contractors select design subcontractors, it is important that each of them carry a level of professional indemnity insurance appropriate to the size of the project and that clients specify in the contract the minimum level of professional indemnity insurance they are to maintain. Most clients or contractors will routinely check at the time of appointing the team that it has the required insurance in place. However, what is sometimes overlooked is that the obligation continues for the entire period - usually 12 years - of the consultant’s or subcontractor’s potential contractual liability for their work on the project.
How many clients continue to monitor that the cover is kept up once the project is complete? And more pertinently, when renegotiating a cheaper deal in conjunction with their broker, how realistic is it for consultants or subcontractors to remember the level of cover needed to maintain sufficient cover for projects completed more than 10 years ago?
Read Article
Building.co.uk
25March 2011
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Friday, 04 February 2011 10:57 |
|
As lenders count their losses from the recession, 2011 could be the year that the number of lawsuits against property valuers explodes
Property is heading for another boom. But rather than yachts and champagne, this boom would be characterised by legal letters and court visits.
Professional negligence claims in the High Court have risen 130% from 147 in 2008 to 339 in 2009, Ministry of Justice figures published in December show.
Claims against surveyors and estate agents rose from one to 17 over that period. The hardest hit area is valuation, in an eerie echo of claims that soared after the late-1980s boom.
Property Week
4 February 2011
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Wednesday, 17 November 2010 14:08 |
|
The National Association of Estate Agents, which is running the scheme, said more needed to be done to protect consumers from unprofessional agents.
In order for an estate agency branch to be licensed, at least one of its agents must be qualified to carry out residential property sales, either through a formal qualification or through having seven years' of experience.
The estate agency will also need to have the required level of professional indemnity insurance in place, be bound by the NAEA agents' rules of conduct and commit to keeping up to date with industry developments, while the individual who is licensed will have to undertake 12 hours of continuing professional development every year.
Mirror.co.uk
17 November 2010
|
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:55 |
|
The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, RICS, published its update list of “Listed Insurers” on 1st October 2011. The RICS issue a list of insurers who have obtained listed status by meeting a number of prescribed criteria. RICS Members are required to purchase Professional Indemnity Insurance cover from one of the listed insurers and must obtain cover on a policy wording stipulated and worded in line with a policy wording agreed between the RICS and the insurance industry.
The criteria used by the RICS in compiling its list of insurers include the insurers authorised or recognised status, their credit rating status, their agreement to write their policy in line with certain agreed contract terms and on a no less comprehensive basis than the RICS policy wording. Insurers must also be listed for the purpose of the assigned risk pool which is a insurance option of last resort for surveyors who are unable to obtain PI in the open market.
Whilst a PI Insurers policy wording does not need to mirror, word for word, the RICS template, it does need to duplicate the policy conditions as well as being on an any one claim, civil liability basis. For more information about the required coverage’s and minimum required RICS limits please go to our surveyors page.
A copy of the minimum wording can be viewed on the RICS web site.
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Tuesday, 05 April 2011 10:26 |
|
The Supreme Court last week delivered a landmark decision in the case of Jones v Kaney, effectively abolishing the immunity previously afforded to expert witnesses from claims for negligence arising out of evidence prepared for the purposes of, and in connection with, legal proceedings.
Insurers will need to consider carefully the potential ramifications of this decision. In particular, they will need to monitor new claims notified and resulting from expert witness work (hitherto considered by insures as low risk in view of the immunity previously in place).
Insurers will need to consider the impact this ruling may have with regard to the pricing of Professional Indemnity Insurance policies for those who work in these areas. Insurers may wish to consider whether to exclude expert witness work from standard professional indemnity policies, and then to write it back in where necessary, possibly via a specific endorsements to cover such work and with an extra premium payable, depending upon the Insurers perceived risk.
David Hedgecock
Hammond Professional Indemnity Consultants
5 April 2011
|
|
Written by Dave Hedgecock
|
|
Friday, 04 February 2011 11:38 |
|
In October 2010 and as part of its commitment to protect the public interest and to raise the standards its members work to, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has launched a new registration scheme for members undertaking valuation work. The RICS Valuer Registration Scheme.
Whilst the scheme was launched in the 20 October it will become mandatory in the UK from 30 April 2011. This will apply to all RICS members providing valuations in accordance with the RICS Valuation Standards (the Red Book).
The RICS Rules require members to ensure that all valuation work carried out is covered by adequate and appropriate professional indemnity insurance.
On what basis must cover be held?
For a policy to comply with the RICS Rules in the UK then it must meet the following criteria:
- Be underwritten by an RICS listed insurer
- Incorporated RICS minimum policy wording
- Be retroactive for at least 6 years, or to the date your firm began trading if this date is less than 6 years ago
- Have a level of indemnity of at least £250,000 (highest levels are required in the firm’s turnover is over £100,000. If turnover is between £100,001 and £200,000 then the amount increases to £500,000 and to £1million if turnover exceeds £200,000)
- The limit of indemnity should be on an each and every claim basis
- Uninsured excess of a maximum of 2.5% of the limit of indemnity or £10,000
For firms in the UK: ‘Each & Every and Any on claim’ is what is accepted under the minimum terms of adequate and appropriate Professional Indemnity Insurance. Aggregated cover will only be considered as adequate and appropriate where there is a ‘round the clock’ reinstatement on the policy, which is only usually found on indemnity policies in excess of £2m with a layered PI policy. Therefore this is not standard and must be brought to the attention of the RICS
|
|
Written by Hammond
|
|
Wednesday, 05 January 2011 11:02 |
|
Professional indemnity (PI) premiums for small firms are set to soar by up to 30% following Quinn Insurance's withdrawal from the market.
Sandra Neilson-Moore, Marsh's European practice leader for law firms' PI, said that for the first time ever what was happening in the smaller end of the solicitors' PI market was affecting the larger firms.
Broking.co.uk
4 January 2010
|
|
Written by Hammond
|
|
Tuesday, 02 November 2010 14:51 |
|
The ABI said it "backs the recommendations in the report that, for a sustainable solicitors' professional indemnity market to continue, the following changes must be made:
The minimum terms of the policy, as required by the SRA, must allow insurers to set premiums that more accurately reflect the risks of work carried out.
- The funding of the Assigned Risks Pool (for solicitors unable to get professional indemnity insurance) needs to change to provide more incentives for the profession to deal with the small number of poorly run firms by transferring the costs of the ARP more explicitly to the profession.
- As with other types of insurance, insurers should be able to cancel a policy if a solicitor fails to pay its premiums. At present insurers cannot do this, so firms in difficulty find it easier to stay in business, so presenting more risk to their clients. -- The single common renewal date should be scrapped
Insurance Journal
2 November 2010
|
|